“If anything, the report suggests that the army unit’s lack of security and discipline was as much to blame for the disappearance, given the sergeant’s history.” New York Times OpEd, June 6, 2014

“This OpEd’s blaming Bergdahl’s army unit (for his decision to walk away from his base and capture) is outrageous, in my opinion. Sgt. Bergdahl (unless determined mentally unfit) is responsible for his own decisions and actions. It’s all part of a growing and disturbing view espoused by the mainstream press and other liberals these days that individual American adults are not responsible enough to make their own decisions and be accountable for their own actions. Whether it is a decision to walk-away from a base in an extremely hostile war zone or take out a mortgage loan (a legal, contractual obligation). Come on!!! This NYT’s OpEd equating Sgt. Bergdahl’s leaving “assigned areas” in non-war zones in the U.S. (and later returning), with his leaving his base in a very hostile area of a war zone in Afghanistan is not comparable (and this sets aside all the other facts, like sending his computer and notebook home just before he left). As a further example of my point, today, there is also a ridiculous article in the Wall Street Journal (“Next-Door Neighbor Nightmare”) that tries to blame bank-owned foreclosed homes nearby as the reason other homeowners’ blood pressures, alcohol consumption, and weight have all increased!!!”, Mike Perry, former Chairman and CEO, IndyMac Bank

The Opinion Pages | EDITORIAL

The Rush to Demonize Sgt. Bergdahl


Four months ago, Senator John McCain said he would support the exchange of five hard-core Taliban leaders for the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. “I would support,” he told CNN. “Obviously I’d have to know the details, but I would support ways of bringing him home and if exchange was one of them I think that would be something I think we should seriously consider.”

But the instant the Obama administration actually made that trade, Mr. McCain, as he has so often in the past, switched positions for maximum political advantage. “I would not have made this deal,” he said a few days ago. Suddenly the prisoner exchange is “troubling” and “poses a great threat” to service members. Hearings must be held, he said, and sharp questions asked.

This hypocrisy now pervades the Republican Party and the conservative movement, and has even infected several fearful Democrats. When they could use Sergeant Bergdahl’s captivity as a cudgel against the administration, they eagerly did so, loudly and in great numbers. And the moment they could use his release to make President Obama look weak on terrorism or simply incompetent, they reversed direction without a moment’s hesitation to jump aboard the new bandwagon.

The last few days have made clearer than ever that there is no action the Obama administration can take — not even the release of a possibly troubled American soldier from captivity — that cannot be used for political purposes by his opponents.

Though we criticized the administration for ignoring the law in not informing Congress of the transfer of the Taliban detainees 30 days in advance, leave it to Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and other hyperventilators to claim that continued release of prisoners from Guantánamo without prior notice is now considered an impeachable offense, a ludicrous leap.

Gov. Rick Perry of Texas says the whole exchange was cooked up to distract the public from the Veterans Affairs scandals, and the talk-show crowd has piled on Sergeant Bergdahl’s father for his suspiciously long beard.

Cowering politicians now even seem to regret their initial burst of joy that a prisoner was coming home. “A grateful nation welcomes him home,” said Representative Lee Terry, Republican of Nebraska, in a Twitter message on Sunday. The statement on his website was deleted a short time later. “Warmest regards to his family with gratitude for his/their service and sacrifice,” wrote Representative Stephen Lynch, Democrat of Massachusetts, in another quickly deleted tweet.

This duck-and-cover response is the result of the outrageous demonization of Sergeant Bergdahl in the absence of actual facts. Republican operativeshave arranged for soldiers in his unit to tell reporters that he was a deserter who cost the lives of several soldiers searching for him. In fact, a review of casualty reports by Charlie Savage and Andrew Lehren of The Times showed there is no clear link between any military deaths and the search.

And a classified military report shows that Sergeant Bergdahl had walked away from assigned areas at least twice before and had returned, according to a report in The Times on Thursday. It describes him as a free-spirited young man who asked many questions but gave no indication of being a deserter, let alone the turncoat that Mr. Obama’s opponents are now trying to create.

If anything, the report suggests that the army unit’s lack of security and discipline was as much to blame for the disappearance, given the sergeant’s history.

Thousands of soldiers desert during every war, including 50,000 American soldiers during World War II. As many as 4,000 a year were absent without leave for extended periods during the Iraq war. They leave for a variety of reasons, including psychological trauma, but whatever their mental state, it is the military’s duty to get them back if they are taken prisoner. That’s what the Obama administration did in this case, and there was a particular sense of urgency because a video showed that Sergeant Bergdahl’s life might be in danger.

But the critics seeking political advantage don’t care about the life or mental state of a particular soldier, or of a principle of loyalty that should provide comfort to any soldier in danger of capture. They live only for the attack.

Correction: June 5, 2014 
This editorial previously omitted a portion of a statement Mr. McCain made on CNN. The full quote is reflected in this version.
Correction: June 5, 2014 
An earlier version of this editorial referred incorrectly to the deletion of a Twitter message from Representative Terry.
A version of this editorial appears in print on June 6, 2014, on page A22 of the New York edition with the headline: The Rush to Demonize Sgt. Bergdahl . 

Posted on June 6, 2014, in Postings. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: